I'm a Sight Unseen
I have chosen
my first blog post to rewrite for the final. I chose this post
because I received the worst score so why not make another attempt at
a hard topic. I feel that I have a way better understanding of the term deviant now than three months ago.
Many have made
imprints on my life. If someone takes my life and throws it through a
social filter they will see that I was raised by two straight,
Caucasian, middle class, married of 30+years parents. I have two
brothers and we were all raised in a drug, alcohol, and cursing free
atmosphere. My questions to you is why do we socially share our ways.
Why do we filter data, images, opinions, and details of our daily
lives? This socio-mental filter is what guides our understanding.
It's just like a lens in a camera, what one can see with an image in
front of them can change when it is placed on a piece of paper. Why
do we alter how an image appears? What is it about our society that
makes this change acceptable?
So how does one
perceive me? Can you visually perceive someone? I was born in this
world with an "empty" mind. The world was what we could
perceive it. A perfect imprint of empirical reality. My world has
been changed by my experiences with others. Many people struggle with
the different labels they are given throughout their lives. Labels
place people into categories like nerd, jock, dumb blonde, bible
freak, and so on. These labels are examples of what society has
created. Society has built a system that helps people have a better
understanding of what they consider deviant and normal. Labeling
helps this structure and these values are passed on generation after
generation. These labels help us police each other, “Social groups
create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitutes
deviance, and by applying those rules to particular people and
labeling them as outsiders” (Becker 39).
When you walk
into a room with people you know, what is your emotional reaction?
How about if you walk into a room and you don't know anyone. Will
your reaction be the same? Most of us know that the answers are
different in many ways. With our society we can label individuals as
deviant when they haven’t committed a deviant act, “some people
may be labeled deviant who in fact have not broken a rule” (Becker
39). This reminds me of a first impression. To have a social
interaction with a person, we need to know how to talk to them. For
example if one tries to speak to an individual who they don’t know
if they are a male or female then the social interaction will
different because the mind is focused on the persons gender. Our
society doesn’t know how to treat people that have been labeled
deviant and this can form grouping patterns. This brings me to the
question of what conversations are okay in the presence of friends,
family, and co-workers. Now, the way I speak in front of a friend is
not the same as when I talk to my mother. Why is this?
This week I have
been viewing each conversation from a different angle. I have always
known that what I say to people always varies by who is in the room
but the realization has changed many views on things. Now looking at
the daily conversations with these individuals I have really seen how
inappropriate and "Deviant" they can be. To me this is my
"norm" and with my friends and co-workers they intermix.
Two of my closest friends are my bosses or have a "higher rank."
These personal associations can influence an individual’s behavior,
“The person’s associations are determined in a general context of
social organizations” (Sutherland 28).
Since labels
have all these negative associations it creates a system of fear.
People are so afraid of being labeled that they instead try to
distance themselves away from this feared difference. The fact that
as a society we dehumanize, demonize, stigmatize and so on has helped
create these different categories of deviance. When people realize
that what they say is inappropriate they will sometimes turn them
into "inside jokes." Jokes that are still inappropriate to
us but the average person would never guess and this helps cover up
the inappropriate topics. And these topics aren't inappropriate to
the people talking about them but instead this method is a way to
cover up a deviant act. This is a very important detail that
co-insides with my other job.
As a female
firefighter I work in an all-male testosterone filled work
environment and they never say anything that is appropriate.
Organization is a big thing in the fire service and, “Much of
social life is organized and routine, and many of our interactions
take place within organizations” (Wharton 86). The fire house is a
socialized atmosphere and they all think it is funny to see people’s
reactions to each other’s jokes. When reviewing fire history one
will read that these jokes are known as coping mechanism in regards
to the many different calls medical or fire related that are run and
sometimes don’t end well. I have seen more in one day then the
average person will see in a life time. These boys are my family and
these jokes are only said when we are within closed doors. The main
comment that is pasted around is "I'm not racist, I hate all
races equally." Is this right? It’s a different way to view
the idea of racism and it pushes the ideology that focusing on only
the black and white, which simply doesn’t represent all races. This
reminded me of the differential theory and how groups influence/teach
each other, “The principal part of the learning of criminal
behavior occurs within intimate personal groups” (Sutherland 27).
Do you partake
in labeling? Labeling is done at a cultural level because our society
has set impossible standards. We all feed into the vicious cycle and
give these labels power. The example below is a video of Katy Perry
a famous musician that did a skit on Sesame Street. She wanted to
play dress up with and then sang her song “Hot N Cold” with the
famous Sesame Street character Elmo. As you can see the skit was very
simple. But parents across the United States were very upset that
Katy's breast were showing and that her dress was simply to short.
Now, after watching the video I saw nothing inappropriate and in fact
my three year old nephew loves it! But the media is a big influence
on people’s lives and Sesame Street ended up pulling the show/skit
in regards to the viewer’s requests.
The
video below is one example of people questioning the reasons behind
the show being pulled off the air. It point out that it is a kid
friendly show. They talk about how the children are following Elmo
and enjoying all the bright colors. It also spoke about how the
children have no distention to why or how this video is controversial
and instead this is just a conflict with the parents.
Then you have the
classic video called 'Charlie Bit My Finger' which
is about two brothers sitting in a chair. The older brother Harry
decided to put his finger in his younger brother month. The younger
brother then bit the finger and the peer entrainment of 56 seconds
one can see the reaction. This film has over 449,790,848 views on
youtube.com and is very funny might I add. But the interesting thing
about this video is how much coverage it had from the media. I saw it
on every news show for weeks even Oprah had Harry and Charlie on her
show. This video was labeled funny and cute. But what if this was two
adult brothers sitting in a chair and one bit the others finger.
Would the label be different?
Oldspice is a
brand of shower gel that has been around for years. The company
started to advertise with “The man your man could smell like”
campaign. These advertisements where directed toward a female
audience. This advertisement style has changed how the media
advertises. But this commercial below is an example of how society
views the ideal man. This shows how society assumes this common value
system towards groups that violate the norms. This brings up the
question of “Why do men differ in their beliefs about what
constitutes good and desirable conduct,” (Hirschi 31) and the
assumption that the male is in this dominating group.
This hierarchy of
gender enforces those beliefs of able bodied individuals. The idea
that every person in a wheelchair wants to be able to walk is a myth.
Society creates these filters that allow these ideas to happen and
then reinforces them with videos like below which make fun of a
disabled body. This adds to the stigma. The film below is about a
horse that only has two legs. It is a 'retarded' horse and when you
listen to the music you can see how demeaning it truly is. But maybe
it’s okay not to walk because one can still have a very fulfilling
life. People like Mark Zupan challenge the stigma of being disabled.
So in the end what is deviancy? Who is deviant? What makes them deviant? I'm not going to sit here and say I'm not deviant but in comparison to others I'm not. Why am I able to compare myself to others. Growing up in a society that offers less to people that have a deviant behavior has created an individual that fears breaking the norm. The strive to perfection is an incredible journey but not very piratical. Why is it that our society has set standards that are too hard to reach by the average joe?
This leads me
into the pictures above. Religion is always a tough topic to speak
about but religion has many ties into society consideration of
fornication. The social norm of abstinence before marriage used to be
considered normal but now it's abnormal, “you got to try it before
you tie it,” are many jokes that are said in regards to getting
married. Now, classifying this behavior as deviant would make people
feel uncomfortable so instead society has now taken the behavior and
made it acceptable. It is an encouraged and even desired behavior. A
thing that most religions like to consider an deviant act is
pornography. This is a topic that almost everyone has partaken in
durning some point in their lives but it is consider 'dirty'. I don't
know a single man that has ever told me he has never seen porn but
this can be because women have been more sexualize in our society
than men.
So what is
deviancy? It is a word that has evolved over many years. It can be
used to label people as a rule breaker or different from the daily
norm. But the term will always be around even though as a society we
have evolved and developed a sense of tolerance for many human
behaviors. For example almost half the population participates in
divorce. How as a society can we consider this deviant when it has
slowly became the norm? We may not look at it as a deviant behavior
but instead we can view it as a social problem.
Word Count: 2013 (barely made it!)
Citations:
Wharton,
Amy S. The
Sociology of Gender: An Introduction to Theory and Research.
Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub., 2005. Print.
http://crimeanddeviance.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/CH08figure1.png
Thio, Alex, and Thomas C. Calhoun. Readings in Deviant Behavior. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2001. Print.
Thio, Alex, and Thomas C. Calhoun. Readings in Deviant Behavior. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2001. Print.
Howard
S. Becker. "Labeling Theory." Readings
in Deviant Behavior.
Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2001. Print.
Sutherland,
Edwin H., and Donald R. Cressey. "Differential Association
Theory." Readings
in Deviant Behavior.
Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2001. Print.
Thio,
Alex, and Travis C. Hirschi. "Control Theory." Readings
in Deviant Behavior.
Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2001. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment